< Back to
table of contents
The Eiffel Project
New York City's Small Schools Partnership
Technology Learning Challenge
Version 1.2
September 1996
Contents
2) The Response: A Digital Pedagogy
for New Learning Communities
2a) The School and the Child
2a1) Use Digital Libraries to Enhance
Learning
2a2) Interact with Mentors and Experts
at a Distance
2a3) Synthesize Knowledge through
Project-Based Problem Solving
2a4) Integrate Educational Experience
through Portfolios
2) The Response: A Digital Pedagogy for New Learning
Communities
By itself, technology is a limp educational resource. To benefit
complex persons and communities, effective educational ideas and
actions must inform use of information technology. The Eiffel Project
seeks to infuse technology with powerful pedagogical ideas, and
to empower those ideas with the force of technical innovation. We
explain our pedagogy in two sections. First, in "The School and
the Child," we present our convictions about how the reform of schools
combined with the astute use of technology can liberate the child
to learn more effectively, more deeply, more meaningfully. Then,
in "The School and Society," we examine how the reformed school
opened to the world through digital networks will help children
be more effective and sure as they encounter the complexities of
public life, the workplace, and the culture.
2a) The School and the Child
To achieve its educational objectives, the Eiffel Project needs
to make them real in the educational experience of participating
students and teachers. Our mission is the radical improvement of
educational experience for thousands of students and teachers, and
as they model new educational possibilities, for millions more.
Education is the end; reformed schools and new technologies are
the means.
In this section we discuss four established educational elements
- libraries, experts, project-based learning, and portfolios. Significant
change is possible because information technology strengthens their
educational power. Technologically transformed, these all loosen
the intellectual constraints operating in the school and thereby
expand the educational potentialities of the child.
2a1) Use Digital Libraries to Enhance Learning
Digital libraries -- the distributed, on-line collection of texts,
images, sound, video, simulations, and data, along with powerful
tools for using them -- radically reduce constraints on cultural
and intellectual participation that traditionally operate in educational
institutions. Columbia University is drawing out the implications
of digital libraries for the advancement of learning through design
initiatives by the Center for Research on Information Access, the
Center for New Media, and the Center for Image Technology for New
Media, and through implementation projects in art history, history,
chemistry, earth sciences, journalism, and so on. Within this overall
effort, the Institute for Learning Technologies (ILT) directs application
of work on digital libraries to the reform of K-12 education.
Digital libraries can significantly loosen the constraints that
have historically determined the spectrum of possible educational
achievement by the young. Digital libraries are a key, emerging
agency that makes feasible the basic aim of enabling students growing
up under conditions of adversity to attain unprecedented levels
of excellence. Whether modeling El Niño effects with data from the
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, researching Renaissance portraiture
with the Columbia Art Humanities digital image archive, or comparing
Orson Welles' and Roman Polanski's interpretations of Macbeth using
a multimedia database constructed by the New Lab for Teaching and
Learning, students can be engaged in serious disciplinary study
when they have access to digital libraries. To enable students and
teachers to make full use of digital libraries in their daily educational
work, we will concentrate on four tasks:
- Infrastructure. Extend local area networks into classrooms and
link these to the world's information infrastructure by very high-speed
connections, permitting small groups of students to work collaboratively
to employ digital libraries in responding to significant questions
and difficult problems.
- Content. Work with scholars, practitioners, teachers, and community
leaders to develop comprehensive and specialized collections;
tools of analysis, synthesis, and simulation; and strategies of
engagement to make the digital library a routinely accessible
and easily usable resource in the educational work of students
and teachers.
- Support. Provide schools and teachers with effective professional
development experiences that will enable them to adapt to the
emerging pedagogical possibilities and provide students with tools
to consult hierarchies of on-line expertise that will sustain
an inquiry-driven learning process.
- Evaluation. Engage in the continuous formative evaluation of
such efforts in order to assemble a record of practical experience,
which can then lead through progressive reflection to improved
practices and an understanding of guiding principles.
2a2) Interact with Mentors and Experts at a Distance
One-on-one adult mentoring is tremendously effective in helping
young people cope with the complications of integrating all the
disparate elements of human development. Wide-area networking can
greatly lower the cost in money and time that such mentoring entails.
Multimedia, wide-area networks, and desk-top videoconferencing will
likewise enable problem-solving groups in schools and communities
to interact with diverse strata of experts, who can help the groups
advance their efforts. The Eiffel Project will work to design and
implement ways to use digital technologies to enable working groups
of students to interact, frequently and easily, with mentors and
experts.
To make interactions between students, mentors, and experts sustainable
and effective, it is important to recognize and respect the constraints
inherent in adult responsibilities. Mentors and experts cannot ignore
imperatives of their own work to take up the concerns of children.
Rather, the educational work must synchronize with their professional
efforts or it will become a complicating, distracting chore. The
Eiffel Project will work with both the business community and the
academic community to design ways to enable their members to work
educationally as mentors and experts while minimally deflecting
them from their primary goals.
Junior Achievement of New York City, a strong chapter of a national
effort by business people to provide volunteers to teach children
at all levels about the economics of work and life, will join in
the Eiffel Project to use advanced media to facilitate their mentoring
work. Currently, Junior Achievement volunteers go to a school to
teach specially designed courses and to provide counsel and advice.
This procedure has limits arising from the constraints on the volunteer's
time and it leaves the student at a distance from the world of practice
that the volunteer represents. As schools become wired, so do businesses,
and it becomes possible for the students to gain virtual access
to the operations of the work world, with volunteers from it acting,
not as emissaries, but as hosts. Junior Achievement will work through
the Eiffel Project to implement these possibilities as an important
means of strengthening the understanding of economic life that children
in participating schools develop and as a productive way to improve
the school-to-work transition.
Small groups of students, working to solve difficult problems,
often need to discuss their ideas with people who have greater expertise
than they, or their teachers, may have. Wisdom and skill are scarce
qualities, however, and eminent scholars would be overwhelmed were
every curious novice to take his questions directly to the highest
possible authority. Through the Eiffel Project, we will use distance
learning technologies to create a relationship between schools and
universities that enhances educational processes in each domain
without deflecting people in either from their proper concerns.
Students will develop the capacity to judge when someone else has
satisfactorily helped to clarify their questions. If responses to
queries have been sufficient, students should go on to other matters,
and if they have not, they should push on with their inquiries,
seeking other, more productive interlocutors. On the university
side, responding to school-based queries can become an important
enhancement to learning in higher education. Consider the academic
cliché that someone never learns anything so well as when he must
teach it. Undergraduates will advance their study of a subject by
helping children in schools answer difficult questions, interacting
with them through distributed learning technologies. Queries that
the undergraduates find too difficult to help with, they can refer
to graduate students, and from there, if necessary, to research
scholars, professors, and other professionals. A team from the Institute
for Learning Technologies and the Center for Imaging Technologies
for New Media has developed a prototype desktop videoconferencing
system by which universities can announce the availability of respondents,
and students in schools can initiate exchanges as suits their inquiries.
As part of the Eiffel Project, we will develop the prototype into
a working system and test it in key subject areas.
2a3) Synthesize Knowledge through Project-Based Problem
Solving
As it exists, the school separates the fabric of learning into
discrete strands according to grade, subject, period, and lesson,
and the curriculum converts powerful intellectual means into the
operative ends of educational work -- e.g., whereas the historian
uses chronology, the high-schooler learns it. Advanced media in
education permit the reintegration of intellectual activity in the
school, as students use powerful on-line tools and work with the
contents of the digital library to pursue answers to the questions
and issues that animate scholarship, science, and professional practice.
How can a major research university, collaborating with diverse
schools, shift the process of curriculum development away from packaging
prescribed epitomes of answers to be learned by cohorts of pupils
toward a process of selecting and putting powerful questions worth
engaging all students in the effort to answer them?
A successful response to this question must meet key constraints
- 1) development costs need to be limited; 2) a unified set of changes
affecting the educational process from beginning to end needs to
be introduced; 3) changes need to be on one side radical and thorough,
yet on the other relatively well-aligned with existing practices;
and 4) educational results need to be dramatically better than those
of the status quo ante. The Eiffel Project, through its relationship
to Columbia University, will use advanced media to develop a pedagogy
of project-based problem solving designed to meet these constraints.
This effort will build on a range of prior work by the New Laboratory
for Teaching and Learning at the Dalton School developing powerful
curricular prototypes such as Archaeotype, at the Ralph Bunche School
with Internet-based inquiries such as The Great Penny Toss, and
through ILT's Harlem Environmental Access Project.
Basically, the new curricula will have three components -- questions
or problems requiring solution, tools or intellectual strategies
for working on the problems, and resources or data and materials
upon which the tools can operate. The first task of curriculum design
is to lay out highly generative sets of questions, put forward without
answers, which students can address at one or another level of sophistication:
- FAQs, or Frequently Asked Questions, pronounced "facts." For
any subject there are many FAQs, which can be organized according
to difficulty and scope. A FAQ requires a clear, informative response.
In educational experience, it is useful to work up answers to
many FAQs, developing in the process a clear overview of a subject.
- HAQs, or Hotly Argued Questions, pronounced "hacks." HAQs generally
elicit more heat than light, and the challenge to the student
is to understand why the question so provokes the passions. In
educational experience, a HAQ should elicit a clear presentation
of all sides of the argument, with a dispassionate weighing of
the strengths and weaknesses on each side. Such treatment of a
HAQ will develop perspective and intellectual independence.
- LUQs, or Largely Unanswered Questions, pronounced "lucks." The
object in engaging with a LUQ is not to try heroically to answer
it, but to ascertain what aspects of it are subject to comprehension
and to be able to explain why the question remains largely unanswered.
In educational experience, a LUQ leads the student to reflect
on the limits of knowledge and to set his sights on extending
it.
- PIQs, or Profoundly Important Questions, pronounced "picks."
With a PIQ, the key is to grasp the importance of the question
and to feel the urgency of developing a response to it, as well
as the import of that response. In educational experience, a student
comes to realize that a PIQ can affect the fundamental prospects
of life, personal or collective, as operative answers to PIQs
contribute to defining what it means to live and to be human.
Tools and resources gain meaning in relation to such sets of questions
because tools and resources are what a problem-solving student employs
in seeking to respond productively to questions that have been effectively
posed. On-line tools and resources suit a problem-solving pedagogy
because they are comprehensive and unbounded, sustaining the questioning
process without extrinsic limitations. We believe that academic
groups can be very helpful curricular resources for students and
teachers in schools by identifying key sets of questions, building
powerful tools with which students can address those questions,
and opening paths to significant resources, grist for the educative
mill of inquiry.
Initially, scholars from Columbia's African Institute, researchers
from classics, history, and archaeology, and scientists from the
Black Rock Forest Consortium, Biosphere II, and the Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory will work with students and teachers in the Eiffel
Project to develop and test this model of problem-solving curriculum
development. It allows for high-level academic involvement in the
process while keeping operative control of inquiry and learning
in the hands of teachers and students at the school level. Each
year, academics will lay out a distinctive set of questions for
their respective fields and they will work to provide a growing
repertoire of tools and resources useful in pursuing generative
questions from each field. But organizing and putting questions
so that collaborative groups embark on a course of problem solving,
and activating and using the tools and resources, will remain the
work of teachers and students, done distinctively in each school.
We envision the University annually publicizing its technology learning
challenges across a variety of fields, posting sets of FAQs, HAQs,
LUQs and PIQs, along with continually developing sets of smart tools
and intellectual resources linked to them. Collaborative groups
of students, with teachers on site and mentors and experts at a
distance, would use the on-line system of tools and resources to
develop their unique responses to these learning challenges, posting
them to the world on their local websites. As the Eiffel Project
proceeds, we will extend this pedagogy across all the areas of learning
as quickly as resources permit. We believe that such a pedagogy
can meet the four key constraints indicated above and lead to the
radical restructuring of the curriculum in ways that will be highly
conducive to effective learning by all students.
2a4) Integrate Educational Experience through Portfolios
Portfolios are an educational resource that can enable students
to tie together all the lines of experience indicated in previous
sections, using networked multimedia tools to create a public persona
that expresses the cumulative character of their studies, achievements,
and interests. In Coalition schools, the portfolio constitutes a
representation of a student's total academic experience, either
within one course or across many. It assembles academic work that
exhibits the student's development through his studies. As for the
professional, so for the student: a portfolio presents cumulative
accomplishment through assembled work. As such, the portfolio --
along with the accompanying exhibitions or performances -- stands
as documentation of where the student has been and what the student
has done through reflective action.
A networked, multimedia information environment extends and reconfigures
the portfolio as a curriculum tool in three important ways:
First, as the student works in more diverse media, the palette
of tools with which he may engage his subjects broadens. In the
print-based school, most activity is limited to reading and writing
textual material; in a digital school, students work with image,
audio, video, and text more freely and continuously. They learn
the "grammar" of video and audio editing, just as they always have
the grammar of text. Two key partners, the Educational Video Center,
which has pioneered use of video production as a means of education,
and the Institute for Learning Technologies, which has done the
same using web-site production as an educative tool, will join to
integrate these techniques into the project's portfolio designs.
Second, as the student works in a networked information environment,
he can extend the audience for his portfolio as widely as the student
or his teachers desire. The networked school thus connects two fundamental
concepts in the small schools effort -- portfolio and exhibition.
Exhibition ceases to be set apart and becomes inherent in the portfolio,
through which students and teachers can engage each other's work.
Work can be shared asynchronously; students can make their work
accessible, allowing others in the virtual community to comment,
advise, respond at their convenience. In a sense, work is always
on exhibit except where workers feel it is not ready for public
view.
Third, as the student works through the inherent web-like structure
of a hypermedia "document," the portfolio ceases to be an assemblage
of finished works. The virtual portfolio becomes a dynamic combination
of refined, polished works with works-in-progress, notes, annotations,
and even passing thoughts. In this sense, the hypermedia portfolio
is a fuller realization of the basic notion of the portfolio because
it easily allows the student to document all his thinking, and it
allows the student to keep active the total corpus of his academic
and other intellectual experiences and acquirements throughout his
academic career as the portfolio is built over time.
In the context of the Eiffel Project, the portfolio will be a central
structure, used in novel ways that build on past successes. One
of the participating Partnership schools -- the Central Park East
Secondary School (CPESS) -- has been at the forefront of graduation
by portfolio for many years. In June 1996, CPESS graduated its sixth
high school class by performance-based assessment. Students must
prepare and defend 14 different portfolios of material to graduate.
We will build on this experience with portfolio assessment in order
to use it in new ways in new schools.
For instance, in addition to dissemination of project work within
the network of project collaborators, students, teachers, and schools
can begin to disseminate their portfolios and share their knowledge
and ideas on a national, and even a global, scale. Working with
Eastman Kodak Company, our consortium will use digital imaging to
experiment with the documentation of multimedia portfolios in CD-ROM
format. Since few members of the larger educational community enjoy
the broadband network connectivity that makes high-speed multimedia
networking feasible, CDs represent a simple, and increasingly inexpensive,
means for teachers and students to exhibit their work. Of course,
students will mount this work on the Web, as well, to promote easy
use by those with adequate connections.
Portfolios and exhibitions not only enable students to integrate
their educational experience: they equally enable the Eiffel Project
itself to integrate its pedagogical accomplishments and present
them to the general public. The portfolio process can play an integral
role in teachers' professional development and in program dissemination
as well. As CPESS students can represent their work in multimedia
portfolios, so too can their teachers. Through such documentation,
parents and the public can assess, critique, exhibit, and acclaim
teachers' work. Thus the teacher portfolio is a professional development,
a dissemination, and an accountability mechanism all in one. Whole
schools can use the multimedia portfolio in similar ways to exhibit
their innovations and disseminate successful programs and projects.
Such online resources will enable the Eiffel Project to engage
parents more productively. For instance, through a carefully placed
network of off-site nodes, available at hours outside the typical
9:00 to 3:00 school day, parents will be able to access teachers
and school web-sites and portfolios, enhancing their role as stakeholders
in the education of their children. As we add schools, so will we
add such community service providers, for instance, the Harlem Parents
Tutorial Project, with a 25-year history of parent training, as
key in administering off-site parent access to the network and the
adult involvement in the education of their children that the network
provides.
Educational accountability remains an intractable public problem
largely because the work and fruits of education are hidden from
view behind classroom walls. What the Eiffel Project enables students
and teachers to accomplish with respect to each of its pedagogical
objectives will be visible to anyone who cares to look. How students
and teachers work as educators -- how they develop the small schools
ethos, use digital libraries, collaborate in learning, interact
with mentors and experts, synthesize knowledge while solving problems,
engage in civic issues, seize workplace opportunities, create cultural
meanings from multiple traditions, and integrate it all into expressions
of unique personhood -- will be public knowledge, evident through
the portfolios of project participants. The school and the child
leads through emerging networks to an entirely new relation between
the school and society, one that opens innumerable opportunities,
enabling children to develop their capacities to the fullest possible
extent.
go to next section
go back to top
|