< Back to table of contents
Toward a Place for Study in a World of Instruction
|
Robbie McClintock
Institute for Learning Technologies
Teachers College — Columbia University
December 2000
|
Section 8 — An Encyclopedia of Study
|
¶ 79
|
I wonder if it would be possible to adapt encyclopedias and
other works of reference so that they would be more helpful
in self-set study. The word "encyclopedia" originally meant
the complete curriculum, the full circle of studies, a meaning
that it held up to the age of print when writers and publishers
began to apply it to books that dealt inclusively with all subjects
of knowledge — the reader's university. Such books had been
written before the spread of printing; perhaps the most representative
was the Speculum majus by Vincent of Beauvais (1190-1264)
who divided his work into four parts, which treated nature,
theology, morals, and history. [ 66 ] This
functional organization of the encyclopedia -- in which the
different types of knowledge, however they were conceived, were
set forth, each in its integrity — characterized early encyclopedias.
The practice of arranging encyclopedia articles alphabetically
was an eighteenth-century innovation which gained much prestige
when it was used in the great French Encyclopedia edited by
Diderot. Yet in developing their Encyclopedia, Diderot and his
colleagues had clear ideas about the system of knowledge; they
almost used a functional organization dividing knowledge into
the sciences, the liberal arts, and the mechanical arts; and
they chose the alphabetical arrangement, not for its intellectual
superiority, but for its reputed convenience for readers. [
67 ]
|
¶ 80
|
Alphabetic encyclopedias are by no means the only possibility,
and for purposes of study, this form has several drawbacks.
The most serious is that it fragments knowledge. And fragmentation
holds the reader in a dependent state with respect to the diverse,
authoritative contributors to the great collective work. With
feelings of dependence, people develop the habit of going to
the encyclopedia for instructive information about things they
do not know well; but they will at the same time find it hard
to study the alphabetic encyclopedia and to derive from it a
full understanding of a connected circle of subjects, a clear
conception of the varieties of knowledge, their principles,
interrelationships, and applications. To be sure, by means of
cross references one can get from Charlemagne to Alcuin and
onward, from topic to topic. And further, articles on the basic
disciplines (provided that one knows their names) give an overview
of their principles; but the way these principles are to be
worked out and applied in substantive fullness is rarely displayed.
In short, the alphabetic encyclopedia tends to instruct, especially
on isolated particulars, and is difficult to study. It is no
accident that this format came into vogue as the world of instruction
began to flourish.
|
¶ 81
|
Alternatives are available. One of the most interesting is
the Encyclopédie de la Pléiade which is perhaps the
greatest encyclopedic innovation since the work of Diderot.
The Encyclopédie de la Pléiade has been designed for
study, "to permit the modern man to grapple lucidly with the
problems that confront him in furnishing himself with a complete
and synthetic view of contemporary science while at the same
time recalling to himself the road that humanity has to date
traversed." [ 68 ] The encyclopedia is divided
into two series, the methodological and the historical, some
fifteen volumes on particular subjects, each between 1,000 and
2,000 pages long, have been published in each series. The great
value of such a format is that it encourages the thoughtful
study of large subjects, of coherent systems of principles;
it helps people form a conceptual framework by which they can
intelligently relate one thing to another. Yet that is not the
end of its value. Contrary to the assertion of the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Pléiade is
in some ways more useful for reference than is an alphabetical
encyclopedia: to be sure it takes a little more thought to decide
to look up Beethoven in the volume on Histoire de la Musique, instead of in that section
devoted to Beethoven, but that inconvenience is more than made
up for when one decides to relate Beethoven to Mozart, for one
can do it simply by turning back a few pages, rather than by
scuttling after another ten-pound tome.
|
¶ 82
|
Such innovations in encyclopedias are by no means the only
possibilities for orienting serious academic Publications to
the interest of the independent student. The extensive Que sais-je series published by the Presses Universitaires
de France is an admirable example of a leading academic press
commissioning important scholars to write lucid introductions
to their specialties that will thereafter be aggressively marketed
to "non-students" of every type. Yet the example of the Encyclopédie
de la Pléiade seems particularly pertinent in the English
speaking world, for the staid university presses of Oxford,
Cambridge, and Harvard are not likely to follow Paris and plunge
into systematic popularization, while it would seem that one
of the American encyclopedia publishers might well adopt the
Pléiade pattern. In format, the Encyclopedia
Britannica, the Encyclopedia Americana, the World Book,
and so on are remarkably similar products, which are made competitive
by being subtly adapted to embody various sales pitches specially
directed at particular, large-scale markets. It would be a major
step towards recreating the world of study if one of these publishers
would dedicate their resources to offering the largest market
of all, men studying, a choice and not an echo.
|
|
|
|
Endnotes
|
| Note 66 |
Emile Mâle uses the Mirrors of Vincent of Beauvais as the basis for
his analysis of Gothic iconography in The Gothic Image,
op. cit., n. 29, passim. It is an excellent introduction
to Vincent's encyclopedic conception. [Back] |
| Note 67 |
For the systematic conceptions behind the French Encyclopedia, see Jean Le Rond D'Alembert. Preliminary
Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, trans. Richard
N. Schwab. New York: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1963. Some
of that Encyclopedia's more interesting articles can be
found in N. S. Hoyt and T. Cassirer, eds. and trans. Encyclopedia, Selections. New York: The Library
of Liberal Arts, 1965. There is a good article on the history
of encyclopedias in the 11th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica.
[Back] |
| Note 68 |
Catalogue of Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, No. 56,
Spring, 1970, p. 16. The format of the encyclopedia itself conduces
to study, not reference, as the volumes are easily portable
and light enough to hold comfortably while reading. I am pursuing
comparisons like these further in a project on "Patterns of
Popularization: a comparison of how encyclopedias and popular
books in French, German, and English offer access to knowledge
and culture," which I am doing in The Institute of Philosophy
and Politics of Education. [Back] |
|
|